Posts: 3,176
Threads: 630
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
26
25-10-2016, 06:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 26-10-2016, 07:12 PM by cyclone.
Edit Reason: Removed some texts.
)
Shareholders should note the updated indicative dates for the following events:
- Expected date for the payment of the Scheme Price : 27 October 2016
- Expected date that the Scheme Shares will be transferred to the Offeror : 27 October 2016
- Expected date for the delisting of the Shares : 31 October 2016
Bought at around 2 in 2010, sold at around 1 in 2014. Now it is delisted at 1.68.
Specuvestor: Asset - Business - Structure.
Posts: 3,104
Threads: 121
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
45
What was ur rational for buying at the peak prices??
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
Posts: 3,176
Threads: 630
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
26
(25-10-2016, 07:21 PM)BlueKelah Wrote: What was ur rational for buying at the peak prices??
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
It was a STI component stock., a blue chip. Must be safe.
It was a duopoly. The business must be good.
The dividend must be secured, around 4%. Nice.
It was majority-owned by Temasek. Could sleep well.
Specuvestor: Asset - Business - Structure.
Posts: 888
Threads: 16
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation:
8
The lesson to be learnt is that 4% yield is NOT nice enough. To be on safer ground, the dividend yield must be 7% or more.
Posts: 2,746
Threads: 23
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
25
(25-10-2016, 08:10 PM)soros Wrote: The lesson to be learnt is that 4% yield is NOT nice enough. To be on safer ground, the dividend yield must be 7% or more.
safe and secure, wont get consistent 7% in normal times.
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
Posts: 3,104
Threads: 121
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
45
Cyclone thanks for sharing. Yes smrt looked safe but wasn't that cheap. Blue chip status also can be over like Noble if the industry tanks.
Soros I am also a 6.5 to 7% kind of investor. Though I am flexible for 6%+ in select cases.
Opmi, agreed that's why I am waiting sti below 2000 to wack some st engineering @7% yield lol...
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
Posts: 4,264
Threads: 93
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
85
(25-10-2016, 08:02 PM)cyclone Wrote: (25-10-2016, 07:21 PM)BlueKelah Wrote: What was ur rational for buying at the peak prices??
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
It was a STI component stock., a blue chip. Must be safe.
It was a duopoly. The business must be good.
The dividend must be secured, around 4%. Nice.
It was majority-owned by Temasek. Could sleep well.
The 2nd and 3rd reasons were pretty much the same reasons why i bought it previously. The retail biz empire that was created by Madam Saw was just too seductive for me to watch during the daily travel. It had a tailwind from the Gov's liberal immigration policies until the pumping spill into the maintenance problem that eventually burst the bubble.
The only slight difference was that i have learnt and managed to cut losses earlier.
I am not a certified financial advisor and so nothing of what I say should be construed as financial advice. Please consult a certified financial advisor for advice instead.
Posts: 2,746
Threads: 23
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
25
iron rice bowl already...why work so hard....sell all the tough business...collect 5% margin every year from rail...
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster