Posts: 3,176
	Threads: 630
	Joined: Sep 2010
	
Reputation: 
26
	 
	
		
		
		25-10-2016, 06:55 PM 
(This post was last modified: 26-10-2016, 07:12 PM by cyclone.
 Edit Reason: Removed some texts.
)
		
	 
	
		Shareholders should note the updated indicative dates for the following events:
- Expected date for the payment of the Scheme Price : 27 October 2016
- Expected date that the Scheme Shares will be transferred to the Offeror : 27 October 2016
- Expected date for the delisting of the Shares : 31 October 2016
Bought at around 2 in 2010, sold at around 1 in 2014. Now it is delisted at 1.68.
	
	
	
Specuvestor: Asset - Business - Structure.
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3,104
	Threads: 121
	Joined: Apr 2013
	
Reputation: 
45
	 
	
	
		What was ur rational for buying at the peak prices?? 
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3,176
	Threads: 630
	Joined: Sep 2010
	
Reputation: 
26
	 
	
	
		 (25-10-2016, 07:21 PM)BlueKelah Wrote:  What was ur rational for buying at the peak prices?? 
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
It was a STI component stock., a blue chip. Must be safe.
It was a duopoly. The business must be good.
The dividend must be secured, around 4%. Nice.
It was majority-owned by Temasek. Could sleep well.
	
 
	
	
Specuvestor: Asset - Business - Structure.
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 888
	Threads: 16
	Joined: Feb 2011
	
Reputation: 
8
	 
	
	
		The lesson to be learnt is that 4% yield is NOT  nice enough. To be on safer ground, the dividend yield must be 7% or more.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,746
	Threads: 23
	Joined: Mar 2013
	
Reputation: 
25
	 
	
	
		 (25-10-2016, 08:10 PM)soros Wrote:  The lesson to be learnt is that 4% yield is NOT  nice enough. To be on safer ground, the dividend yield must be 7% or more.
safe and secure, wont get consistent 7% in normal times.
	
 
	
	
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3,104
	Threads: 121
	Joined: Apr 2013
	
Reputation: 
45
	 
	
	
		Cyclone thanks for sharing. Yes smrt looked safe but wasn't that cheap. Blue chip status also can be over like Noble if the industry tanks.
Soros I am also a 6.5 to 7% kind of investor. Though I am flexible for 6%+ in select cases. 
Opmi, agreed that's why I am waiting sti  below 2000 to wack some st engineering @7% yield lol...
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,348
	Threads: 96
	Joined: Aug 2011
	
Reputation: 
85
	 
	
	
		 (25-10-2016, 08:02 PM)cyclone Wrote:   (25-10-2016, 07:21 PM)BlueKelah Wrote:  What was ur rational for buying at the peak prices?? 
sent from my Galaxy Note 7
It was a STI component stock., a blue chip. Must be safe.
It was a duopoly. The business must be good.
The dividend must be secured, around 4%. Nice.
It was majority-owned by Temasek. Could sleep well.
The 2nd and 3rd reasons were pretty much the same reasons why i bought it previously. The retail biz empire that was created by Madam Saw was just too seductive for me to watch during the daily travel. It had a tailwind from the Gov's liberal immigration policies until the pumping spill into the maintenance problem that eventually burst the bubble.
The only slight difference was that i have learnt and managed to cut losses earlier.
	
 
	
	
I am not a certified financial advisor and so nothing of what I say should be construed as financial advice. Please consult a certified financial advisor for advice instead.
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,746
	Threads: 23
	Joined: Mar 2013
	
Reputation: 
25
	 
	
	
		iron rice bowl already...why work so hard....sell all the tough business...collect 5% margin every year from rail...
	
	
	
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster