(17-07-2017, 03:35 PM)Terry Wrote: Okp is awarded Contract because they low bidder.
This project Okp is 25% below 2nd lowest bidder and 50% below 3 & 4 lowest bidder.
I just want to say that one should not look too much into the bid differences for some of these contracts. Look through the LTA tenders and you will notice that large bid differences for major contracts are much more common than people believe since it is impossible to know what everyone else will be bidding. This is especially true when the final number of bidders is low. Just to give you a few examples:
LTA contract ER397A Expansion of KPE/TPE Interchange including Link Road to Punggol Central (coincidentally awarded just a few months before OKP's project)-
1 Hock Lian Seng Infrastructure Pte. Ltd. / T.Y.Lin International Pte. Ltd. Pt 1 297,260,00 Pt 2 4,279,600
2 Hwa Seng Builder Pte. Ltd / T.Y.Lin International Pte. Ltd. Pt 1 185,060,000 Pt 2 4,279,600
3 Or Kim Peow Contractors (Private) Limited / CPG Consultants Pte Ltd Pt 1 216,270,000 Pt 2 3,609,600
4 Tiong Seng Contractors (Private) Limited / YWL Engineering Pte Ltd Pt 1 313,357,00 Pt 2 4,326,800
5 China Railway No. 8 - Wai Fong Construction Pte Ltd. J.V - Not Shortlisted
Winner Hwa Seng's bid was 15%/31Mil lower than OKP and ~40% lower than the 3rd and 4th bidders
ER403 Construction of Vehicular Underpass at Nicoll Highway/ Guillemard Road Junction
S/No. Name of Tenderer Base Alternative Remarks
1 Chye Joo Construction Pte Ltd 58,786,303 ---
2 Hock Lian Seng Infrastructure Pte Ltd 65,300,000 ---
3 Koon Construction & Transport Co. Pte. Ltd. 59,300,000 ---
4 McConnell Dowell S.E.A. Pte Ltd 85,057,574 ---
5 Or Kim Peow Contractors (Private) Limited Base (Option 1): 68,827,000.00 Base (Option 2): 68,227,000.00
6 Penta-Ocean Construction Co., Ltd 77,888,000 ---
7 Samwoh Corporation Pte. Ltd. 75,880,000 ---
8 Sato Kogyo (S) Pte. Ltd. 44,980,000 ---
9 Swee Hong Engineering Construction Pte Ltd 62,700,000 ---
10 Tiong Seng Contractors (Private) Limited 75,000,195*
*The Tender Amount in figures is $75,195,000 which does not tally with the Tender Amount in words " Seventy-Five Million One Hundred and Ninety-Five Only"
Winner Sato Kogyo bid 24% lower than 2nd lowest even though with 10 bidders, you would expect the difference to be a lot closer.
Or to give a more extreme example:
TR150 Next Generation Electronic Road Pricing System
S/No. Name of Tenderer Base Alternative Remarks
1 Ncs Pte. Ltd. / Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine System Asia Pte Ltd 530,541,882.00 507,526,414.00
2 St Electronics (Info-Comm Systems) Pte Ltd 1,260,000,000.00
3 WatchData Technologies Pte Ltd / Beijing WatchData System Co Limited - Not Shortlisted
In a 2 horse race, NCS/MHI submitted a bid that is > 50%/$700 m less than its only other competitor.
In all these instances, no one will bother to dig up the actual tender results and overanalyse until an accident actually happens and the speculation starts.
PS: Pardon the odd formatting as I just copied and pasted the info above from LTA's tender information page.