Great Eastern Holding

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The circular and IFA opinion has been released and a couple of interesting stuff.

(1) Regardless of listing status, the dividend policy and disclosure requirements will be very similar. Besides the Company Act, OPMIs holding GEH as an unlisted company are also "protected" by the FHA Act on paper as well. But in practice, OPMIs who may hold unlisted GEH shares are ultimately protected by the fact that OCBC is listed and has a reputation to defend/protect.

(2) A shareholder of GEH gets ~1-1.50sgd increase in embedded value per year. And adding the dividend yield of ~4%, the paper return is a 9-12% sort of annual return. But in practice, the only folks who can monetize those returns are OCBC and the descendants of some trust/estate of your ancestors.

(3) The same IFA, E&Y Corporate Finance has been employed and used the same methodology as 1 year ago. Very coincidentally, the exit offer price of 30.15sgd is 5cents above the IFA's lower range of 30.10sgd. As a result, the IFA has deemed the price to be fair. But after all, a bitter taste is left as IFA reduces the range of values by the 45cent dividend paid out last month. I thought some "goodwill" could be shown by OCBC by disregarding the 45cents dividend though. Wink

CIRCULAR TO SHAREHOLDERS

Barring unforeseen circumstances, the Company aims to maintain each dividend amount to be no lower than the preceding one. As at the Latest Practicable Date, the Company has no intention to amend its stated dividend policy even if it is delisted. In addition to complying with these statutory and regulatory requirements, the Company intends to maintain a high standard of financial transparency and governance disclosure. With a wide range of stakeholders, including Shareholders, policyholders, distribution partners, reinsurers, debt investors and regulators, it is important for the Company to practise good financial disclosure to ensure adequate transparency and accountability to gain and retain the support and confidence of its stakeholders. The Company intends to continue to make available key and relevant financial metrics on a quarterly and annual basis, to ensure that its stakeholders are kept informed of the Company's financial performance throughout the year. On an annual basis, the Company will continue to publish an Annual Report, which will include the financial statements of the Company and the GEH Group for the financial year, as well as other pertinent information and disclosures to enable Shareholders to have a better understanding of the GEH Group's business and performance. On a quarterly basis, the Company will continue to provide summarised updates on key and relevant financial metrics. These updates will be published on the Company's corporate website.

As reported in the AR2024 and using the same best estimate, reserving and capital requirement assumptions as those used in the calculation of Embedded Value as at 31 December 2024, the Economic Value of One Year’s New Business of the GEH Group as at 31 December 2024 is SGD621.5 million (2023: SGD682.8 million) or SGD1.31 per Share (2023: SGD1.44 per Share) as reported in the AR2024.

We note that only one of the Comparable Transactions has information on the Embedded Value of the target. The P/EV Ratio of the GEH Group implied by the Exit Offer Price of 0.8 times is below the implied P/EV Ratio of 1.5 times for the Aviva-Singlife Consortium transaction. It should be emphasised that the stake acquired in the Aviva-Singlife Consortium transaction is approximately 75.0%, to which a control premium may be ascribed.

We note that the average P/EV Ratio of the Comparable Companies which have consistently reported their Embedded Values over the 10-year Period is 0.8 times. When the multiple of 0.8 times is applied to the reported Embedded Value per Share of the GEH Group as at 31 December 2024 of SGD38.08 and after adjusting for the dividend of SGD0.45 per Share paid on 6 May 2025 (being after 31 December 2024, which is the date used for the reported Embedded Value of the GEH Group), the resulting value is SGD30.10 per Share.

GEH delisting circular + IFA opinion
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/GEH%20Cir...eID=848383
Reply
It is true that OCBC is an important distribution partner for GEH, accounting for ~25-30% of annual gross premiums. But GEH BOD has stated that all related party transactions are "at arms length and on normal commercial terms" and so for a OCBC OPMI to say that GEH is not been charged (by OCBC) fair value for distribution, is misguided.

GE proposal: OCBC minority shareholders’ perspective

We do not want OCBC to overpay for GE. Last year’s offer at S$25.60 was already a 37 per cent premium over GE’s last traded price of S$18.70. OCBC was also not buying a controlling stake in GE as it had already owned over 88 per cent in May 2024.

OCBC’s current exit offer for GE is clearly not its own wish. It was made at the request of GE, to help it get out of a limbo marked by months of trading suspension and repeated extensions granted by the bourse operator to find palatable solutions.

A look through GE’s financials will show that bancassurance accounted for more than a quarter of the insurer’s total weighted new sales in FY2024. In fact, it is in OCBC shareholders’ interests to start charging fair value for the exclusive use of the bank to sell the insurer’s products.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion...erspective

GEH response to shareholders in April2024:
https://www.greateasternlife.com/content...olders.pdf

P.S. GEH's response to shareholders in April2024 stated that OCBC's % of distribution fees (bancassurance) is ~4% over FY22-23, while the overall distribution fee (agency/direct/bancassurance channels) for GEH is at the range of 6.3-6.7%. At face value, it looks like OCBC is undercharging GEH but this is not apple to apple comparison because agency fees (with active agents) have much higher cost structure than bancassurance in the 1st place.
Reply
The fifth year anniversary did cause some confusion and so it is good that OCBC has come out to clarify.

CLARIFICATION ON MEDIA REPORT REGARDING OCBC’S FUTURE OFFER FOR GREAT EASTERN SHARES

OCBC is electing for the Class C Non-Voting shares at GEH’s request to help GEH to meet the Free Float requirement and the Resumption of Trading. Hence, OCBC has no intention to convert its Class C Non-Voting shares to ordinary shares on or after the fifth anniversary of the first issuance of the Class C Non-Voting shares as it will result in GEH losing its free float again.

Regardless of the outcome on 8 July 2025, OCBC is satisfied with its 93.72% economic interests of GEH since October 2024, up from 88.44% before the VGO in May 2024.

https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/OCBC-Medi...eID=849486
Reply
SIAS/minorities have done a good job to question about the entire process for this voluntary exit offer. A few things could be eluded from this: (a) OCBC seems to be negotiating from a "position of strength", (b) If not abused, the "fair and reasonable IFA opinion" requirement has acted as a reasonable safeguard for OPMIs.

EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON 8 JULY 2025 RESPONSES TO ADDITIONAL SUBSTANTIAL AND RELEVANT QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM SHAREHOLDERS

The Company and OCBC started discussions on the exit offer price before the indicative range of values of the IFA was available. Thereafter, the IFA range of values was shared with OCBC in strict confidence and on the understanding that any exit offer price arrived at finally would have to meet the fair and reasonable requirement under Rule 1309 of the Listing Manual to support the Delisting.

Furthermore, sharing the indicative range of values of the IFA during the negotiation process with OCBC resulted in the final exit offer price of $30.15 per share which was an improvement from the range of prices discussed initially before the IFA’s indicative range of values was known to OCBC and GEH.

5/7 response to SIAS/shareholders:
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/GEH%20Res...eID=851069

3/7 response to SIAS/shareholders:
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/GEH%20Res...eID=850804
Reply
(25-01-2025, 09:33 AM)weijian Wrote: The prior "not fair but reasonable" offer had already closed in Oct2024. So one would assume that Helen Wong's visit is setting the stage for a new offer. These 2 clans own ~50% of the remaining non-OCBC owned shares and so make absolute sense from the offerer's perspective.

OCBC CEO Helen Wong meets Lee family members and other key Great Eastern shareholders holding out on offer

She tried to persuade them to support bank’s attempt to buy up all the shares it doesn’t own in Great Eastern: sources

Earlier this month, she met with Wong Hong Sun and his brother Hong Yen, as well as representatives of Lee Thor Seng and his family, who are longtime shareholders of Great Eastern Holdings with a combined 3 per cent stake, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

The Wongs and the Lees are among Singapore’s moneyed clans. The Wong brothers’ grandfather, Wong Siew Qui, was chairman of Great Eastern Life Assurance from 1951 to 1969. The siblings own a total of 4.8 million shares, or a 1.01 per cent stake in the listed company, according to Great Eastern’s 2023 annual report.

Three companies controlled by Lee and his sons, who are members of the clan that founded OCBC, own about 2 per cent of the insurer, the annual report shows.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/compani...olding-out

From the voting stats: (1) 80% of votes turned up which is a substantial amount and we could reasonably say that absenteeism isn't a huge factor. (2) 1 of the 2 largest SSH (probably Wongs and confirmed to be so later on) voted against it. The 3rd biggest separate minority (Palliser Capital) may have followed the Wongs.

The Wongs' lack of motivation to sell is expected. Since voting on delisting and acceptance of the offer are 2 separate actions, I had thought they would vote for the delisting but not accept the offer. - This was in the context of Helen Wong rumored to have paid a visit just in January.

So it seems that Helen Wong's charm didn't work. Big Grin In essence, millions were paid for advice by but at of the day, it was only enough to convince 1 of the 2 entities who will decide the success. History (probably way past Helen Wong's helm) will determine whether this millions was "pounds foolish" or "penny wise".

‘It’s our grandfather’s company, we won’t sell’, says Wong family as shareholders reject GE delisting bid

At the meeting held at Great Eastern Centre, around 63.5 per cent of minority shareholders present and voting at the EGM voted in favour of the delisting resolution, falling short of the minimum 75 per cent required for the delisting to take place.

Mr Wong Hong Sun and his family, who own 7.56 million shares, representing 25.5 per cent of 29.6 million shares held in total by minority shareholders, voted against the delisting. “This is my grandfather’s company and it’s our legacy. I would not sell it. We are holding for the legacy for our son,” said Mr Wong, whose grandfather Wong Siew Qui was chairman of Great Eastern Life Assurance Co from 1951 to 1969.

He said: “We don’t need the money, so why should we sell at a low price? I told them (OCBC) it must be at a premium to the embedded value. There is no such thing as a discount.” The embedded value for GE is $38.08 per share as at end-2024. Asked if he would sell if the offer price was higher, Mr Wong said: “We might.” His wife Wong-Tan Kar Yean added: “Since the first quarter of 2025, Great Eastern has performed very, very well. You must give us the right price. You cannot oppress the minorities.”

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/gr...fer-lapses
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)