24-02-2015, 01:51 PM
(24-02-2015, 01:21 PM)egghead Wrote:From the wiki on parliamentary priviledge in sg:(24-02-2015, 01:07 PM)thor666 Wrote: My point was that some of the things he would say in parliament land him in legal trouble.
I cannot imagine what he has to say, with parliamentary privilege mind you, that will still get him in legal trouble.
(24-02-2015, 01:07 PM)thor666 Wrote: He seems to be alluding that there is no fair way to discuss this further without getting sued.
Very convenient indeed.
MPs are not liable to the following:
Any civil or criminal proceedings, arrest, imprisonment or damages because of any matter or thing which he or she may have brought before Parliament or a committee by petition, bill, resolution, motion or otherwise, or may have said in Parliament or in committee.[266]
So, parliamentary priviledge is not equalling to absolute free speech. Given PAPs track record of suing, I humbly beg to differ.
I do agree that WP could have done better.
However, the fact is that many Singaporeans are politically inactive, and our opposition parties are very small. Economies of scale plays a big part.
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk