Managing Agent for PAP TC Drops Fees Just before the Attack on WP for "Expensive" Fee

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#11
(24-02-2015, 01:21 PM)egghead Wrote:
(24-02-2015, 01:07 PM)thor666 Wrote: My point was that some of the things he would say in parliament land him in legal trouble.

I cannot imagine what he has to say, with parliamentary privilege mind you, that will still get him in legal trouble.

(24-02-2015, 01:07 PM)thor666 Wrote: He seems to be alluding that there is no fair way to discuss this further without getting sued.

Very convenient indeed.
From the wiki on parliamentary priviledge in sg:

MPs are not liable to the following:

Any civil or criminal proceedings, arrest, imprisonment or damages because of any matter or thing which he or she may have brought before Parliament or a committee by petition, bill, resolution, motion or otherwise, or may have said in Parliament or in committee.[266]


So, parliamentary priviledge is not equalling to absolute free speech. Given PAPs track record of suing, I humbly beg to differ.

I do agree that WP could have done better.
However, the fact is that many Singaporeans are politically inactive, and our opposition parties are very small. Economies of scale plays a big part.

Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Major CPF policy shift on the way - by WolfT - 24-02-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Major CPF policy shift on the way - by thor666 - 24-02-2015, 01:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)